What should a developer do if changes to a dataset were not saved in Foundry?

In the context of managing datasets in Foundry, a developer facing unsaved changes must consider a systematic approach to address the issue. The selection of all options highlights a comprehensive strategy.

Reverting to a previous version can be essential when a developer needs to discard problematic changes or recover from mistakes. This option not only provides a safeguard but also ensures data integrity by allowing the developer to start fresh from a known, stable state.

Checking for unsaved changes in the graphical user interface (GUI) is a practical first step. Often, there may be indicators or prompts that signal unsaved work, and identifying any unsaved modifications can help avoid confusion and potential loss of important data.

Reviewing the commit history is crucial for understanding what changes were made previously. This can assist in reconstructing any lost work and understanding the evolution of the dataset. By analyzing the commit history, a developer can also identify specific changes that may need to be reapplied or further examined.

Overall, considering all these actions ensures that a developer can effectively manage dataset changes and recover from potential losses, making the choice that includes all these strategies the most suitable response.